data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f919c/f919c1348da99dff23223ad764b0b08f6b699fdf" alt=""
Not that he has particularly impressive democratic credentials himself. Chosen as head of the faith, and therefore by default as head of state, by an arcane process of religious mumbo-jumbo, his claim to legitimacy as leader of the Tibetan people has no democratic foundation. The Dalai Lamas long ruled over an impoverished, backward land of aristocrats and serfs as oppressively as the Chinese rule over their Tibet.
The Dalai Lama appears to have put all that behind him, however, and is now a major spokesman for human rights, and that does nothing to endear him to the barons of Beijing either.
The obvious solution would be to let the Tibetans choose their own future, but that is of course not in the cards. So the Chinese are stuck with this annoying pebble in their shoe. And they may be stuck for a long time. After all, the Dalai Lamas, through reincarnation, live forever. The current incarnation, Tenzin Gyatso, declares he won't be reborn in a land that isn't free and has even suggested Tibetans should be allowed to vote on whether or not they accept his rebirth. It's not surprising the Chinese are concerned about an enemy who may never die. On the other hand, he insists on a peaceful approach to the conflict with China, an approach other Tibetans are highly impatient with. The Chinese should at least be grateful for that.
No comments:
Post a Comment