I am, however, concerned about his views on defence policy, seeing as he has the ear of Mr. Trudeau, possibly Canada's next prime minister, and his views are troubling. Mr. Leslie has been reported as saying, "It's not going to be peacemaking anymore, it's going to be counter-insurgency ... Counter-insurgency will not form the cornerstone of our operations, but it's right in the centre of our spectrum of capabilities we're going to train for."
Putting counter-insurgency at the centre of our capabilities raises a number of red flags for me. To begin with, it smacks of secret operations, and I've had more than enough secret operations from our and our friends' intelligence agencies. I don't need any from our military.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92771/92771f21ae3e5e7ba150c8893aca96cb718cdcd6" alt=""
No doubt counter-insurgency is popular with militarists. It's the glamorous stuff, the Navy Seals and all that, and maybe the machismo will infect Trudeau as well. It was, after all, the Liberals who got us into Afghanistan, and they started by sending in forces from the secretive JTF2 without informing the Canadian public. That was more than enough surreptitious slaughter for me.
Leslie will quite likely play an important role in setting defence policy if the Liberals are elected to government, a policy we know little about. This will bear watching ... closely.
Counter-insurgency is a type of warfare for which Canada's army is really not equipped. The lore of asymmetrical warfare from Julius Caesar to Lawrence and Giap is digested in the US military's field manual, FM3-24.
ReplyDeleteThis sort of warfare is the most drawn out, labour-intensive of them all. For example, in Kandahar the FM3-24 specified Canada needed 15-25,000 combat troops instead of the miniscule 2,500 strong garrison force we fielded which, on a good day, could deploy about 800 fighting soldiers.
There are reasons why Afghanistan turned into such a miserable failure. Why should Canada pursue that into the future?
Maybe he's thinking ahead to the counter insurgency required once the rabid Conservatives lose the election?
ReplyDelete