As cities assume increasingly greater importance relative to provinces, the debate over revenue-sharing intensifies. With limited taxing powers relative to the senior levels of government, cities must beg their provincial masters for grants for major projects. Consequently, they have long sought stable sources of revenue.
Smith claims the Wildrose plan, termed the Community Infrastructure Transfer, will provide more stable funding than the grant system
and precludes municipalities fighting for new taxing powers. The plan will "give municipalities the right to choose their own priorities, with no strings attached, eliminating needless layers of bureaucracy and a patchwork of funding programs."
The Wildrose proposal was no doubt motivated by the party's strong opposition to new taxes at a time when Alberta's cities are seeking just that. The City of Calgary, for example, is looking at over two dozen ways of raising revenues and hopes to adopt some of them if it can negotiate a city charter with the province.
The Wildrose proposal was no doubt motivated by the party's strong opposition to new taxes at a time when Alberta's cities are seeking just that. The City of Calgary, for example, is looking at over two dozen ways of raising revenues and hopes to adopt some of them if it can negotiate a city charter with the province.
The Community Infrastructure Transfer concept seems a worthy contender for revenue sharing. It at least offers the government and the municipalities a yardstick for their negotiations.
gives
municipalities the freedom to choose their own priorities, with no
strings attached, eliminating needless layers of bureaucracy and a
patchwork of funding programs that play to the whims of the PC MLAs in
the Legislature - See more at:
http://www.wildrose.ca/press-releases/just-the-facts-wildroses-plan-for-municipalities/#sthash.
Wildrose’s
10-10 plan gives municipalities the freedom to choose their own
priorities, with no strings attached, eliminating needless layers of
bureaucracy and a patchwork of funding programs that play to the whims
of the PC MLAs in the Legislature. - See more at:
http://www.wildrose.ca/press-releases/just-the-facts-wildroses-plan-for-
This is something I've suggested for decades. The removal of such tax sharing/funding certainty by the Socreds was loudly trumpeted as a fiscal evil by Peter Lougheed and his upstart PC party back in 1971. Of course, once in power, the PCs continued the notion that the provincial government was magically better attuned to the needs of the voters than municipal governments all around the province.
ReplyDelete